Mr. President nominate Janice Rogers Brown, and let the Battle Begin

October 29, 2005 by Matt Heckman.

I am joining the call of many conservatives in endorsing a nomination for Janice Rogers Brown for the U.S. Supreme Court. Janice Rogers Brown is not only a Judge that fits the mold of Justices Thomas, and Scalia, but Janice Rogers Brown would be the ideal choice to begin to restore the Judiciary back to the founding founders original intent which is to interpret law from only the Constitution of the United States. Justices are not given the right to make law from the bench, or by referencing foreign law to justify their own agendas. Roe vs. Wade is a prime example of making law from the bench which is why the Liberals are going crazy. Liberals have not been able to pass their agenda from the congress which is where it belongs. Liberals believe in having a elite group of Justices setting the agenda for all of the American People, and that is simply not American. Roe vs. Wade is only one small reason why the Liberals will try to stop a fine Judge like Janice Rogers Brown, but private property rights, how we handle terrorists, and the list goes on and on.

To play a theory for a minute let’s just say that Roe vs. Wade gets overturned. As the Liberals would say this would ban abortion. That statement is not true. The issues of abortion would fall to the states to decide weather to make it legal, or illegal.

Bottom Line being is with a Constitutional Supreme Court in place a lot of the programs on the federal level such as social security, welfare, and so on would fall under the rights of the states to decide on what they want to do. California may want to have a social security system which is all in good if the people of that state approve of it, and maybe Pennsylvania want’s a different type of social security system, and then maybe Ohio does not want a social security system in place at all. Not all 50 states are the same, and our founders knew this with the original 13. They also believed in the concept of limited government, and would never wanted a federal government that we have today.

Posted in Uncategorized | Print | 22 Comments »